The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On February 11, 2014, at around 01:30 minutes of the charge, the victim C (the age of 18, South) committed an act of assaulting the victim’s face 5-6 times on the floor by cutting the Defendant’s breath and assaulting the Defendant’s breath in drinking breath on the ground that the Defendant was faced with the Defendant’s shoulder at the drinking house in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si. Around February 11, 2014, the victim C (the age of 18, South) committed an act of assaulting the victim’s breath, using the Defendant’s face on the floor, continuously 5-6 times in drinking. The Defendant committed an act of assaulting the victim on the part of the victim’s breath, with the victim’s breath and the part of the breath, which requires treatment for about three weeks.

2. We examine whether each of the statements made by the victim and E is credibility in the direct evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged of the instant case.

First, the following circumstances acknowledged by the records of this case, namely, ① the victim, immediately after the instant case, refers to the Defendant’s personal information, and left the scene with cash of KRW 20,00,000, ② the victim filed the instant complaint against the Defendant after being investigated as the suspect status due to the Defendant’s complaint, ③ the date of the diagnosis in the form of injury submitted by the victim is indicated as “ February 14, 2014, which is after the Defendant’s complaint,” ③ the doctor preparing the written diagnosis of injury, the doctor who prepared the written diagnosis of injury, the victim’s symptoms complaining of the victim, and the victim did not have any special credit at the time of the diagnosis. ④ In light of the contents of this article, it is difficult to readily conclude that the victim’s credibility is beyond a reasonable doubt in the victim’s statement.

Next, in light of the following circumstances, namely, ① the circumstances at the time of the instant case, E is rather than the Defendant.