A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 5, 2015, at around 20:25, the Defendant: (a) was investigated by the police officer, such as the police box guard E, etc., of the Ansan Police Station D that sent out after receiving a report that the Defendant was at the time of B from a restaurant operated by Ansan-si, Ansan-si, the Defendant: (b) took a bath to the police officer, and (c) took a view that “I will talk to the police officer, who is in charge of the on-site, and I will talk to the police officer,” the Defendant “I will see if I are responsible for the on-site, I will am the same bit B, bit B,” and the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the report by the police officer on two occasions by walking the lower part of the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement in E and B;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographic records (the form of a vehicle in which A is walking through E);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the decision of sentence): there is no person who has been a special offender] / The normal circumstances favorable to the decision of sentence : it reflects the fact that there is no person who has been a same criminal record; other circumstances unfavorable to the person who has no same criminal record: The defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, the circumstances of the instant crime, after