logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.11.12 2020고단1789
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the driving of a e-car in the e-car.

At around 00:40 on March 10, 2020, the Defendant driven the above van, and led to turn to the left from the upper radiation distance to C.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by complying with the signal and properly manipulating the steering system and steering gear by checking the evis-visvis.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front portion of the victim E(E, 34 years old) driving, which was proceeding in accordance with the new line from the d university room by the negligence of failing to make a left turn in violation of the signal, as the front part of the above knife car.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim E, such as scam sckes, etc. requiring approximately 8 weeks of medical treatment on the part of the victim G (Nam, 58 years of age), who was the franchise of the above franchise in need of medical treatment for about 4 weeks, suffered injury such as dysckes, tensions, etc., in need of medical treatment for about 2 weeks to the same victim H (Nam, 54 years of age), and suffered injury to the victim I (Nam, 55 years of age), for about 2 weeks of medical treatment, such injury as knee sckes, etc., in need of medical treatment for about 2 weeks to the victim J (Nam, 44 years of age), for about 5 years of age, for about 5 years of injury such as other elbelfs, etc., in need of medical treatment, for about 2 weeks of injury to the victim K (Nam, 50 years of age), for about 425 years of age.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. On-site photographs and photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning criminal facts;

arrow