The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor of the gist of the grounds for appeal, the defendant can recognize the fact that the minors of this case are juveniles and sell alcohol to them, while recognizing the fact that they are juveniles.

Nevertheless, the court below acquitted the defendant, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) around 03:00 on August 31, 2014, the Defendant: (b) sold to the Defendant’s business establishment, who is a minor E (17 years of age, female), F (17 years of age, female), G (17 years of age, female), and H (17 years of age, female) two son’s disease (1 year of age, first class of disease), which is a juvenile harmful drug, to the Defendant’s business establishment (17 years of age, and female) for 7,000 won.

3. Determination

A. The lower court determined as follows based on the evidence duly adopted and examined: (i) At the time of the instant case, E, i.e., I’s identification card that was a female female in 194; (ii) F’s identification card that was a female in 1995; (iii) G’s identification card that was a female in 192; and (iv) H’s identification card that was a female in 194; and (iii) the Defendant and his employee M respectively presented another person’s identification card that was an adult; (iv) at the time of the instant case, E was in the state of cremation of the head; (iv) F was in the state of cremation in 165cm; and (v) was in the process of cremation surgery in 194; and (v) was in the process of cremation and cremation; and (v) was difficult for the prosecutor to think that it was a foreign person’s oral report and submitted another person’s identification card.