1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff is the owner of a forest 887 square meters and E forest 1,083 square meters in Gangseo-si, Gangnam-si, and the Defendant is the owner of the instant land, and there is no dispute between the parties.

2. Determination

가. 원고의 주장 원고는 원고 소유의 토지는 맹지로 원고 소유의 토지에서 공로로 통행하기 위해서는, 주위적으로 이 사건 토지 중 별지 제1도면 표시 ㈂, ㈃, ㈄ 부분을 통행하여야 하므로 위 부분에 대하여 민법에 기한 주위토지통행권이 있다는 취지로 주장하고, 위 부분의 주위토지통행권이 인정되지 않는다면 예비적으로 별지 제2도면 표시 ㈁ 부분을 통행하여야 하므로 위 부분에 대하여 민법에 기한 주위토지통행권이 있다고 주장한다.

(b) If a piece of land has no access to a public road, which is necessary for the use of the land, without passing over the surrounding land, and the owner of the land cannot reach the public road, or the cost to reach the pubic road is excessive, he may pass over the surrounding land to the public road, and if necessary he may construct a path;

(1) Article 219(1) of the Civil Act provides that “The right of passage over surrounding land shall be deemed to exist at the risk of causing damage to the owner of the right of passage to the land for the public interest, which is the use of land without a passage necessary for the use of the land by the public interest.” As such, in determining the width or location of the passage route, the method of causing less damage to the owner of the right of passage should be considered.” The degree of necessity should be determined based on the geographical location, location, shape and use of the land between the parties in question, neighboring geographical state, understanding of the users of the adjoining land, and all other circumstances according to social norms in a specific case. The construction of the passage through which automobiles, etc. can pass is permitted according to the method of use of the land, but it