logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.06.27 2017고단1107
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 18, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, “The victim E, who works in the clothing system for a maximum of ten years and has a lot of customers, making profits if a wholesale business is conducted, and it is possible to make profits equivalent to KRW 10 million per month if an investment in the above clothing program is made.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have been engaged in the clothing business at the time and did not think that he would receive money from the injured party to use it as repayment of personal debts, etc., and did not have any intent or ability

At around 02:00 on the following day from the victim by deceiving the victim as above, the defendant was issued KRW 55 million as investment money at the Switzerland apartment parking lot located in the 30 Do-dong, Busan Metropolitan Transportation Daegu Metropolitan City, to the victim.

The Defendant, around 2016, delivered money to the Victim F of the Republic of Korea on or around 2016, had different opinions on whether the said money is an investment bond or a borrowed loan, or its amount, and as the said money has not been refunded, the Defendant, “2017 High Order 1943,” had induced the victim to receive money by deceiving the victim as if he would have made an investment in his clothes business.

On January 2017, the Defendant: “I would like to expand the clothing business, which is currently in the Republic of Korea, to the online business, to the victim F before Jindi who is in the Jinpo-dong of Busan, Jinpo-dong, and I would like to receive profits equivalent to KRW 100 million per month when I invest in the extent of KRW 100 million in this business.

In the receipt of investment funds, the phrase “to use them for the purchase of clothes” was false.

However, in fact, the defendant only made such false statements to receive money from the victim, but did not have the intent or ability to make profits from the victim, and even if he received money from the victim, he did not have a plan to use the money for the money for clothes purchase.

Defendant 2.

arrow