Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant subscribed to multiple insurance in collusion with B, which is a false patient broker broker B, and had received normal hospitalized treatment in the oriental medical hospital, and had the intention to deceiving the insurance company with the insurance proceeds.

around December 2012, the Defendant purchased 8 insurance products, including (ju) and spectrum comprehensive insurance, etc., designated by the said B, and thereafter claimed insurance money to the victim Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. at around 19 days from February 28, 2013 to March 18, 2013, with the purport that the Defendant was hospitalized in the Category D oriental medical hospital located in Gwangju-gu Seoul Metropolitan City for 19 days from February 28, 2013.

However, the defendant was not open to the public, and there was no fact that he was hospitalized in the hospital.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 821,784 as insurance money from the Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. around March 22, 2013, and acquired KRW 4,431,784 in total eight times from around that time to April 16, 2013 as shown in the crime list.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the accused (including substitute part);

1. Entry of a copy of the investigation into the police suspect B concerning the suspect B; and

1. A criminal investigation report (Submission of a seal impression, an accident notification sheet against a suspect, an application for insurance proceeds, etc.), an investigation report (Attachment of results of analysis of medical records of a suspect), an investigation report (Attachment of a copy of an application for insurance proceeds);

1. Application of a copy of an abstract of insurance fraud records (No. 2014 subparagraph 1);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above;