A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a Maz car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.207% in the section of about 10km from the road in the center of the central market in the city of Supo-si in the city of Supo-si to the pressure-preventive wave located in the Eup/Myeon pressure damage caused by the pressure of the newanan-gun in the area of about 0.207 meters in blood.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a marina car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., escapeing vehicle) and the Road Traffic Act (ii).

On December 20, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.207% during blood transfusions on December 20, 2015, and led the front of the road along the intersection of the private distance from the public health clinic at the direction of the public health clinic, which is located in 148 Sinpo City-ro 148.

At the time, there was another motor vehicle waiting for signal signal at the front direction of the defendant, and thus, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to look at the front right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol as above, was negligent in proceeding while driving the victim D (the 43-year-old) driving, followed the Defendant’s vehicle into the front part of the Defendant’s driving.

As a result, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim D, such as light salt in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping and providing relief to the damaged party, even though the Defendant damaged the said low-speed car owned by the victim F by KRW 1,095,224.

3. While the Defendant is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance for violating the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Loss, the Defendant is as described in paragraph (1).