logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.09.29 2015나2068292
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Each part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked, and the plaintiffs corresponding to the revoked part shall be the defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The provisional disposition registration of this case and registration officer’s “A separate registration” were omitted, etc. 1) Grandland Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Sland Construction”).

2) The land of this case is 9,990 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) of R forest land in Innju-si, which is owned by the owner.

On July 30, 2007, the ownership transfer registration under S was completed on July 30, 2007. Accordingly, on March 31, 2008, Samwon-nam Branch of Suwon District Court 2008Kahap140, “the right to claim the cancellation of a sales contract based on the cancellation of fraudulent act and the right to claim the cancellation of ownership transfer registration” as the preserved right (hereinafter “instant provisional disposition”).

(2) On the same day, the registration of provisional disposition (hereinafter referred to as the “registration of provisional disposition of this case”) on the site of this case has been received.

(ii) e.g.

On May 26, 2008, Ss Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Mas”) completed the registration of the right to claim ownership transfer on the instant site. On September 25, 2008, the principal registration of the right to claim ownership transfer was completed on September 25, 2008, and subsequently completed the right to claim ownership registration (hereinafter referred to as “instant right to claim ownership registration”).

3) Meanwhile, on September 25, 2008, the Suwon District Court’s branch office, upon receipt of an application for registration of preservation of ownership with respect to U neutrality, entered the registration in the column for “the indication of the site ownership” in the title section, and entered the indication “the separate registration” in the column for title section. On November 14, 2011, the plaintiffs entered “the separate registration” as “the separate registration is made.” (B) Each of the plaintiffs’ acquisition of ownership with respect to U neutrality, purchased each of the households as listed below, or purchased it in the auction procedure and acquired the ownership thereof (hereinafter the plaintiffs acquired each of the households as “each of the instant buildings”, and acquired the ownership thereof (hereinafter referred to as “the date of registration of transfer of ownership”).

1. Sale and purchase on November 10, 2008, 102-205 150,000,000 in a plan for the resolution of a common design dispute;

2. A 102-204.

arrow