logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.12.26 2013고단2607
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 22:00 on October 30, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (ADF) and the Road Traffic Act (ADF) and the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven a Cren vehicle while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.174%, led the Defendant to drive a Cren vehicle while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.174% and drive a two-lane in front of the Gyeongnampon vehicle in Gwangju at the direction of the Gyeongan market at an irregular speed.

At the time, since it is at night, a person engaged in the driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely operate the operation of the operation and steering system by accurately operating the operation and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the central separation stand in front of the left-hand side of the car of the car of the car of the car of the car of the car of the car of the car of the car of the car of the car of the car of the car of the above car of the victim D (W, 40 years old) who continued to move at the rear side of the car of the car of the above car of the car of the car of the victim.

The Defendant, by occupational negligence, destroyed the 645,416 won of the repair cost, and at the same time, went away without immediately stopping the vehicle and without taking necessary measures, such as providing rescue to the victim, even though he/she suffered from an injury, such as light salt, which requires treatment for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act operated the said Crens vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Specific crimes provided for in the relevant Act regarding criminal facts.

arrow