1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 7, 2014, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on September 7, 2014, and applied for refugee recognition to the Defendant on October 13, 2014.

B. On September 23, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff cannot be deemed as having “a sufficiently-founded fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

C. As to this, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on October 14, 2016, but was dismissed on April 21, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion stated that the refugee interview protocol against the Plaintiff (No. 3; hereinafter “the refugee interview protocol of this case”) states that the Plaintiff did not have been stuffed in its home country, and that the Plaintiff entered Korea for employment purposes without any reason not to return to its home country, and that she would return to her home country after two years of work, but that the Plaintiff did not have any such statement, participated in the demonstration, received money without work in Korea, and was living in Korea, and at any time two to three years of question as to when she could return to Korea.

As such, the refugee interview protocol of this case contains contents different from those not stated by the plaintiff or the plaintiff's statement.

The disposition of this case shall be revoked as there is such a serious procedural defect.

B. According to the evidence No. 3, the Plaintiff stated that the statement unfavorable to the Plaintiff, such as that the Plaintiff applied for refugee status to stay in Korea, that the Plaintiff did not return to Egypt, and that the Plaintiff would return to Egypt for two years.