1. The defendant-appellant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

purport.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: even if considering the results of fact-finding on the creative support of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of this court additionally submitted by the court of first instance, it is identical to the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with

2. If so, the decision of the court of first instance is justifiable in that the remaining amount, which was obtained by selling each of the real estate at auction and subtracting the auction cost from the proceeds of the sale, shall be distributed at one half of each of the plaintiff and the defendant's intervenor, and the decision of the court of first instance is dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition.