logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2019.09.19 2019고정524
건축법위반
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who intends to construct or repair a defendant A building shall obtain permission from the Metropolitan Autonomous City Mayor, the Special Self-Governing Province Governor, or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu;

On May 2015, the Defendant, without obtaining permission, extended the amount equivalent to 166.04 square meters of steel and steel, into a double-story, in the Gyeyang-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building D, and without obtaining permission.

B. Around May 2015, the Defendant, without obtaining permission, extended the amount equivalent to 140.07 square meters of steel and steel, to a double-story, Gyeyang-gu C building E, Gyeyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu, and without permission.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. committed each of the offenses described in paragraph (1) by Defendant B, a representative of the Defendant, committed the same as that described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Articles 108(1) and 11(1) of the former Building Act (Amended by Act No. 13785, Jan. 19, 2016); the Defendants’ choice of a fine for criminal facts; the Defendants’ choice of a fine

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A of detention in the workhouse: A of the circumstances shown in the records and arguments, including the fact that the Defendants acknowledged the crime of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the fact that there are circumstances to consider the circumstances leading to the crime committed by the Defendants, such as the exercise of time and the manufacture of promotional materials containing the phrase that the sale agent would have a dunes, etc.

arrow