A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

In collusion with B, C, D, etc., the Defendant: (a) inducedd the elderly with an economicallyless elderly person to find employment or to have a loan; (b) opened a mobile phone in the name of the elderly; (c) opened an account; or (d) opened a personal business entity as if there were normal incomes upon obtaining various documents, such as resident registration cards, personal seal certificates, and family relation certificates; (d) opened a document as if there were ordinary incomes; or (e) opened a document as if they were in the workplace; and (e) conspired in sequence to acquire pecuniary profits by obtaining vehicle purchase loans

As a result, B (E) prepared a lodging place in Daejeon, Mangsan, etc., and takes charge of loan for the use of elderly people. Defendant (F) received various documents in the name of elderly persons, and took charge of vehicle purchase loan, credit loan, and mobile phone purchase, etc. under the direction of elderly persons, and C induced the elderly persons under the direction of B, etc., and D shared the role of inducing the elderly persons under the direction of B, etc., or managing the elderly persons under the inducement of the elderly persons under the direction of B, etc. at the accommodation, and delivering them to B, Defendant, etc. upon receipt of various documents.

On March 2015, the Defendant conspiredd as above, with the purpose of inducing for profit-making, such as falsely lending six victims, such as making a false loan from around 2014 to 2015, at the front of the Seocho-dong 1381-1, Youngcheon-dong 1381-1, the Defendant: (a) instructed C to attract a guest; (b) as a result, C approach the victim G with the aged, who was an elderly; and (c) enticed C to the boarding house that was prepared in advance by stating that “I would be able to punish money; and (d) leading C to an accommodation that was prepared in advance.”

The Defendant conspireds as above on March 16, 2015, and concluded that the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay even if the Defendant borrowed the vehicle purchase fund from the victim H Co., Ltd.