logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.09.27 2019고단145
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 18, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. at the Gwangju District Court, which became final and conclusive on October 26, 2018, and is currently under suspension of execution. On August 14, 2019, the Seoul Western District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. and became final and conclusive on August 22, 2019.

At around 04:48 on January 4, 2019, the Defendant, along with alcohol in front of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, becomes an issue of calculating the drinking value with the victim C(30 years of age) and the drinking value.

In the same day, the victim's face is taken three times by eating a car, and the victim's face is taken once more, and the victim's face is taken by drinking in front of the same Gu D at around 04:49 on the same day, and the victim's face was inflicted an injury in the number of days of treatment so that the victim can be taken out and the victim can be taken out.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of photographs of the body part of the victim), editing photographs of the body part of the victim;

1. A criminal investigation report (verification of a criminal video), CCTV video CD;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal history records, investigation reports (in inquiry into the results of previous convictions and dispositions during trials), results of disposition of prosecution cases, investigation reports (in the period of stay of execution of suspects), two copies of judgment, and significant facts and regulations of this court;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: A favorable circumstance that repeats the same kind of crime during the period of suspension of execution: A confession, reflective attitude, the fact that it appears to have been agreed with the victim, the fact that it seems that it led to the instant crime due to the editing assistance, labor-management disorder, etc., and that it would not be actively treated and re-imprisoned.

arrow