1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months;

However, the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

Defendant

A is a person who was elected and known to be a candidate for G Party H market in the 6th nationwide local election implemented on June 4, 2014.

Defendant

B is a person known to and known to Defendant A.

Defendant

C is a person who plans and supervises the election campaign for K as the president of the K Election and Countermeasures Headquarters, who has left as a candidate for the J Party H market at the above election.

1. Defendant B’s joint criminal conduct (violation of the Public Official Election Act) known that Defendant A was a person who was prior to narcotics and was involved in only twice in I and twice in 2012, and demanded Defendant A to inform Defendant A of the corruption that may cause Defendant A to fall off the I from 2013.

Accordingly, on May 2014, Defendant A proposed a method of sending a coffee mixed with narcotics to Defendant B by mail to Defendant B, and attempted to receive monetary benefits from Defendant B, a competitor’s side, etc. in return.

Defendant

A on May 21, 2014, A and B met only at the “M hotel” coffee and the “contain restaurant” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L in Gangnam-gu.

At the time, Defendant B asked that “I will go through a question that I will perform narcotics only once. I will do so.” Defendant A suggested that I she “I enjoying a soft coffee,” and that I will send a soft coffee containing a drug component to I on the Chinese single nes and put I into a ship.

On the other hand, Defendant B accompanied with the N Newspaper representativeO, which was known to the general public, in order to engradize as a factual fact, I’s written statements about the medication of narcotics at the time, and had Defendant B hear the above statements, but was also subject to the O’s sign that “no ice” was “no ice.”

Defendant

A from May 21, 2014

5. Until December 27, 200, Defendant B demanded that Defendant B receive a certain amount of consideration from the other candidate in return for putting I into the ship, and “cats which contain no narcotics.”