logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.06.17 2013구합101967
산재, 고용보험료 추가부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, etc. is a company in charge of heat pipeline construction, etc. The Plaintiff is a company in charge of the Plaintiff. On March 16, 2011, the Plaintiff is a company in charge of EMK racing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “EMK Racing”).

) The ESCO Project (hereinafter referred to as “ESCO Project”) with surplus heat supply ESCO Corporation;

(2) On June 28, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a supply contract with 8 billion won (on the basis of partial payment of materials) for the supply value of the heat pipeline construction [ approximately 7.2 km from the final part of the passenger boiler outlet to the former part of the energy connecting parts of the North Korea (hereinafter referred to as “former part of the heating pipeline construction”)]. At the time, the Plaintiff and ESK entered into an agreement with the parties that the said agreement becomes void if the agreement is concluded with the business operator of the Energy Rationalization (ESSCO), and that the said agreement shall be concluded with the order company (EMK), ESS business operator, Si business operator (the Plaintiff), and the Plaintiff entered into a new agreement with the Plaintiff without any change to the terms of the contract. (2) After the ESK passenger agreement, the ESK passenger entered into a contract on the supply value of the steel pipeline construction to the former part of the Energy Pipelines (hereinafter referred to as “Energy pipes”) and the final supply value of the ESCO project from 200 billion won to 200 billion won to the former part of the Energy.

B. On March 22, 2011, the Plaintiff is currently working for the subcontractor (hereinafter “NC”).

(B) 5.3 billion won (including material part 2.8 billion won, construction work part 2.5 billion won, value added tax) with respect to the instant project.

hereinafter the same shall apply.

2) On April 2, 2011, the Plaintiff, the UENC, and the SPG Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “STS”) agreed to subcontract part of the material supply contract of the SPC to the SP for KRW 2.6 billion. On the other hand, the SPC concluded on April 4, 201 to the Korea ENG (hereinafter referred to as “Korea ENG”).

arrow