logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.04.09 2015고단252
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months, and by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who is engaged in driving of the E-learning car, and Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving of F-wing and freight cars.

Defendant

A, around 15:10 on August 24, 2014, at the 15:10, operated the E-learning Vehicle, and proceeded to turn to the left at 31-lane east-ro, e.g., the right-hand turn from the front of the G at the e-Eup/Myeon office of the Si/Myeon, and as it is an intersection where traffic control is not performed without any signal apparatus installed at the time, it is an intersection where traffic control is not performed without any signal apparatus, and thus, if there is a vehicle directly under opposite part by properly examining the right-hand side and the right-hand side, even though there was a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as giving the right-hand route and safely entering the opposite part, even though there was a duty of care to prevent accidents, A neglected to do so, and tried to find and turn to the left

On the other hand, Defendant B driving the above-mentioned cargo vehicle at the temporary border, led to the intersection of the above three-distance crossing from the sloping to the Sungsan Eup/Myeon office in the direction of the sloping line, and it was an intersection where traffic control was not performed at that time, and thus, Defendant B, while driving slowly, did not neglect his duty of care to safely check the sloping line and proceeded at a speed of about 68 km as soon as possible without lowering the speed.

In order to avoid the collision with the vehicles driven by Defendant A, Defendant B received the rear part of the said cargo vehicle’s front part of the said cargo vehicle as the front part of the said cargo vehicle, and continued to exceed the central line, and received the front part of the H-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h-h

As a result, the defendants jointly get the victim J(4) who was on board a self-furd passenger vehicle due to the above occupational negligence, to give excessive blood transfusion due to damage to the large blood relative.

arrow