beta
Text
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 24,616,960 as well as 20% per annum from July 18, 2012 to the day of full payment.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a corporation with the purpose of technical service business, such as inspection of defects in facilities and maintenance, reinforcement, and design. The Defendant was the representative attorney-at-law of the female branch office of the law firm C, and the Defendant’s assistant intervenor is an autonomous organization organized to manage the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B Apartment (3 Dong 141 households and attached facilities; hereinafter “the instant apartment”).
B. On January 11, 2010, the Defendant prepared a contract under the title “the standard contract for safety inspection and precise safety diagnosis of facilities” with the Plaintiff, and agreed to receive KRW 40,000,00 from the attorney’s fees (in case of litigation, 9% of the winning amount) under the following: (a) the type of inspection of the instant apartment as to the instant apartment: (b) the defects and defects in the attached facilities with three apartment units and 141 households; (c) the defective or defective defects; (d) the construction of the primary project construction of the road (8m) and the impact assessment on underground damage; and (b) the method of payment for the contract amount shall be KRW 40,00,000; and (d) the contract amount shall be KRW 40,00,000 at the time of the contract.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant standard contract”). C.
In addition, the Intervenor joining the Defendant as “A”, and the Defendant’s law firm C as “B” and the written agreement was prepared around 2010 (hereinafter referred to as “the instant agreement”) as “B” and the written agreement as “Plaintiff” is written as a technical advice on the lawsuit against B.
The defendant assistant intervenor filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff and Samsung C&T Co., Ltd., the contractor of the apartment of this case, and the case of damages, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "related case"), which occurred at the Seoul Central District Court 2010Gahap2236 (hereinafter referred to as "the case"), and on November 10, 2011, the defendant partly won the plaintiff's supplementary intervenor's decision that "the defendant would pay to each plaintiff 248,656,163 won and damages for delay thereof," which became final and conclusive on December 1, 2011.
[Ground of recognition] A.