1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants and the defendant C's appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be individually counted.

1. The grounds for appeal by the Plaintiff and Defendant C, citing the judgment of the court of first instance, are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance (each of the evidence No. 17-1 through No. 18 of the evidence No. 17) was presented in this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified

Therefore, the reasoning for the court’s explanation on the instant case is as follows, except for adding the judgment on the Plaintiff and the Defendants’ assertion, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance. Therefore, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

(Attached Form 1). (Attachment 2. Additional Judgment

A. On July 2015, when the investigation of violation of the Medical Service Act began on and around July 2015, the Plaintiff’s assertion D’s assertion 1) sold each of the instant real estate to the Defendants in a special relationship between November 10, 2015 and February 11, 2016 (the Defendant A disposed of each of the instant real estate to the Defendants in a special relationship between D’s birth, Defendant B, and C). As a result, D’s excessive disposal of each of the instant real estate was omitted as a result, the determination of whether a fraudulent act should be made by comprehensively considering the entire disposal of each of the instant real estate as one act. 2) Where the obligor continued to dispose of several property in succession, the determination of whether each of the instant real estate act causes insolvency should be made depending on whether each of the instant acts occurred. However, if there are special circumstances to deem a series of acts as one act, whether such a special disposition exists should be determined collectively based on whether the other party is the same as the other party to each disposition, and whether the other party to each disposition is 201 or 4.