logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.12.17 2015고단2939
도로교통법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant's sole criminal conduct;

A. Notwithstanding the fact that a person who does not register a driving school is prohibited from advertising using a name similar to that of a driving school, etc., the Defendant opened an Internet site of D (former E, Change) name similar to a driving school without registering a driving school from April 2012 to November 4, 2015, and used the term “driving school”, “training course”, “training course”, “training instructor”, and “private teaching institute” in the above site.

B. A person who did not register a driving school is prohibited from conducting driving education outside of a driving school in return for payment. However, the Defendant received a total of 30,000 won from 135 students from around January 19, 2014 to October 24, 2015, and received a driving education fee from a student, without registering a driving school. A person who did not register a driving school, using a rocketing car owned by the Defendant, reported the above D Internet site advertisements, and provided a driving education to a H who requested the education of driving on the road. A person who received a KRW 300,000 from a bank in the name of the Defendant under the name of the Defendant for educational expenses from H, as shown in attached Table 1, including the transfer of KRW 30,000 from January 19, 2014 to October 24, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant provided driving education at a price without registering the driving school.

2. A person who did not register a driving school with the Defendant and I shall not receive driving education for a motor vehicle outside the driving school of a motor vehicle in return for payment. However, the Defendant employed I as an instructor for driving education for a motor vehicle, introduced I to the customers who reported the advertisement of the above D Internet site, and then I provided driving education for the above customers, from the I to the above customers.

arrow