1. The Defendant’s disposition of applying for the payment of the difference in childcare benefits against the Plaintiff on April 28, 2014 shall be revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff is working at Korea Labor Welfare Corporation.

From November 3, 2012 to August 11, 2013, childcare leave was taken for childbirth.

The plaintiff was paid childcare leave as follows according to the monthly ordinary wages calculated by the defendant during the above period of childcare leave.

(2) On March 1, 2013, the payment date of the 3.3. 8. 4. 20, 201. 3. 8. 3. 4. 8. 20, 201 to February 2, 2013, 200, 200 2. 3. 1. 3. 5, 205 to April 3, 2013, 2013; 3. 50, 003. 4. 6. 3. 4. 20, 205 to April 3, 2013; 4. 5, 2013 to April 16, 2013; 4. 1. 3. 5, 2013 to April 3, 2013; 1. 5, 2013;

B. On April 24, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant an application to the effect that “The amount of bonuses, long-term service allowances, meal allowance, transportation subsidy, and customized welfare card is included in ordinary wages, and the Defendant is obligated to pay the difference between the amount of the temporary retirement benefits paid at the temporary retirement benefits paid at the temporary retirement benefits based on the fixed ordinary wage as above,” “the Defendant is obligated to revoke the partial payment of the land for temporary retirement benefits to the Plaintiff. The Defendant shall pay the difference between the temporary retirement benefits for childcare calculated on the basis of the fixed ordinary wage and the temporary retirement benefits paid to the Plaintiff by including bonuses, etc., including the bonus, etc. (hereinafter “instant application”).

In order to verify the purport of the application of this case on the same day, the employee in charge of the defendant called the labor affairs consultant B who submitted the application on behalf of the plaintiff.

B is the re-determination of temporary retirement benefits due to the re-determination of ordinary wages.

If the objection form is not a legitimate request such as a request for examination or administrative litigation, I would like to confirm the defendant's opinion corresponding to it.