The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the defendant led to confession and reflects on the crime of this case, and that the victims and the court below agreed to do so.

B. However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant had the same criminal record 30 times; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime due to the obstruction of business; (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime by reflecting the circumstances alleged by the Defendant in the lower court; and (d) the Defendant’s age, circumstances leading to the commission of the instant crime; and and (c) other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the circumstances after the commission of the instant crime, even if considering

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.