beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On November 4, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act at the Incheon District Court, which became final and conclusive on November 12, 2010.
【Criminal Facts】
The Defendant “2012 Highest 10373” is irrelevant to B, a genetic political party, and around 2010, the finance of the Defendant’s management company has deteriorated to the extent that the Defendant’s employees’ wage was not paid. Even if the Defendant borrowed money to another person due to the lack of the Defendant’s property, there was no intention or ability to complete payment, and there was no intention or ability to arrange the credit companies necessary for receiving a real estate project financing loan from a financial right.
1. On June 29, 2010, the Defendant: (a) at the D office in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant, around June 29, 2010, received from the victim the victim E a remittance of KRW 20 million for the purpose of investment, etc. through the bank account in the name of the said company on the same day, by stating that “The Defendant was able to easily seek the city construction project because he/she was son of B, a son, who is a fluent politics; (b) changed the selection of the city construction project in the Nam-gu Urban Environment Improvement Project; (c) selected the city construction project in the face of KRW 20 million; and (d) would return the money that he/she has received without the selection of the city construction project within the number of days.”
2. On August 6, 2010, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement to the victim stating that “the company is able to select a contractor who will work for the company; (b) the office rent of KRW 5 million is insufficient; and (c) the Defendant received from the victim a remittance of KRW 5 million from the victim under the name of the said company as the borrowed money, etc. on the same day through the account in the name of the said company.”
3. On August 18, 2010, the Defendant was under investigation by the Prosecutor’s Office, and is bound by the Defendant unless the attorney’s fee is paid. If the Defendant is detained, the Defendant’s attorney’s fee cannot be promoted in relation to the selection of the contractor.