[Defendant A] Imprisonment with prison labor and fine of KRW 31,00,000 shall be imposed.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a public official who is in charge of the determination of an urban management plan and urban planning services, while serving as a local facility guard from September 2, 2011 to July 20, 2015 as a local facility guard belonging to the city of Si E.

E on September 7, 2012, the Korea Railroad Facility Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Facilities Corporation”) concluded a business agreement with the Korea Railroad Corporation to actively cooperate in the authorization and permission of the former FF lines, and the Si is carrying out the business, and the former part of the Korea Facility Corporation shall select approximately 2.7 km section from Gu G to H as the prospective site for the E-day project and promote the project on December 28, 2012, such as selecting the E-days project. The project section was promoted in the E-si area.

Upon occurrence of the I Connection and interference, the Facility Corporation shall present its opinion to cooperate with the E Si I Connection by means of reducing the section of the Ethy-day parking lot if it provides a site for the installation of the Ethy-day parking lot on the side of the E Si, and decided to comply with it. The Defendant: (a) was in charge of all the affairs pertaining to “the creation of a substitute site for the installation of parking lots and auxiliary facilities related to the F FF Line project”, including negotiations and plans for the promotion of the Ethy-day project; (b) the establishment of a substitute site and zone for the installation of parking lots and auxiliary facilities; and (c) requests for appraisal and deliberation; and (d) the construction of a substitute site for the installation of parking lots and auxiliary facilities related to the Ethy-line parking lot in the F F Line-based parking zone” (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”); (c) around January 18, 2013, prepared a written approval to incorporate the instant land into the parking lot site into the E market.

On January 2013, the Defendant gave advice to B, who was aware of the real estate to be invested in middle school as a pilot at middle school, on the purchase of the instant land scheduled as a parking lot facility site as above, and B, on January 2013.