logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.09.08 2015구합66493
정보공개거부처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s disposition rejecting the disclosure of information as to the information stated in the separate sheet issued to the Plaintiff on June 8, 2015 is revoked.

2.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On May 14, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for the disclosure of information on the details of the respective special activity activities (230 Item) (2) of the National Assembly of 2011, 2012, and 2013 general accounts of the National Assembly of 1031, 1032, 1032, 1033, 1033, 1035).

On June 8, 2015, the Defendant rendered a non-disclosure decision on the ground that “The expenses for special activities need to be disclosed pursuant to Article 9(1)2 and 5 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”) shall not be disclosed, on the grounds that the National Assembly is being used for special activities, such as the operation of committees and the diplomatic activities of National Assembly members, etc., and there are reasonable grounds to recognize that if the details of the detailed expenditure for special activities are disclosed, the annual parliamentary activities of the National Assembly would significantly undermine the national interest or significantly impede the fair performance of duties.”

(2) In light of the aforementioned legal principles, the information pertaining to the information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9(1) of the Information Disclosure Act does not constitute information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9(1) of the Information Disclosure Act, and thus, the information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information pertaining to information

The Defendant’s special activity cost is a budget item with a premise of confidentiality, which is stipulated as “information and case investigation that requires confidentiality” in the “Guidelines for the Formulation of Budget Bills and Draft Fund Management Plans” in the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, and “expenses directly needed for the performance of state affairs equivalent thereto” from the formulation stage. The National Assembly’s deliberation on budget bills, the processing of documentary evidence

arrow