The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment, confiscation, collection 100,000 won) is too unreasonable.

2. There are extenuating circumstances in regard to sentencing, such as the fact that the accused acknowledges and reflects the crime, and that it appears that the crime has been committed while economic circumstances are difficult.

On the other hand, the defendant has a previous conviction sentenced to imprisonment several times due to a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence), the fact that the defendant has provided unclassified game products and provided them with money exchange and speculative businesses, various sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, environment, period and size of game room business, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the court below's punishment is unfair if the crime of category 1 (b) and 2 (b) of the basic area (i.e., administration and simple possession, etc.) of category 3 (b) of the sentencing guidelines) of the basic area (i.e., 10 to 2) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (i., e., speculative game products, speculative gaming machines, online sports soil publishing system) and the basic area (i.e., 8 to 16) of category 3 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (i., e., e., illegal use of game products).

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit.