1. The judgment of the first instance, including the ancillary claim added by this court, shall be amended as follows:

(e).

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the judgment on the conjunctive claim is dismissed or added by this court as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

Under the second sentence of the first instance judgment, the following shall be added:

In addition, the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage (hereinafter referred to as the “registration of the instant collateral mortgage”) within the maximum of 19,000 won for debt security, such as the loan money, etc. as of June 5, 1942 received by the Daegu District Court (Seoul District Court Decision 2962, Jun. 5, 1942, 1941).

) The registration of the instant collateral security was completed, and the registration of the instant collateral security was revoked on June 13, 1948 on September 14, 1948 as the date of the cause of cancellation, and was revoked on September 14, 1948 as the receipt No. 7241 of the judgment of the first instance court, and was modified as follows.

A lawsuit seeking the cancellation of registration against a person liable for registration, i.e., a person who loses his/her right or is not a person who is not a person subject to any other disadvantage (the title holder or his/her general successor) in the form indicated in the registry (see Supreme Court Decision 93Da3925, Feb. 25, 1994) is an unlawful lawsuit against a person without standing to be a party (see Supreme Court Decision 93Da3925, Feb. 25, 1994).

Supreme Court Decision 96Da48350 delivered on April 24, 1998 see Supreme Court Decision 96Da48350 delivered on April 24, 199. Therefore, the