logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.03.09 2016고단4811
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 9, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assault, etc. against a driver) , the Defendant spited the victim D (the remaining, 57 years of age) on the new taxi distance in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, into the house located in the Defendant located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, which is a destination, at around 03:30 on the same day, the Defendant spits the spit on the inner floor of the taxi at the right right-hand turn from the long distance of the telephone station in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan City to the left-hand turn at the left-hand turn.

In this regard, the victim of the defect "the death of the deceased."

“A driver of a motor vehicle who is in operation in one time at the right-hand of the victim’s own by sound and assaulting the driver of a motor vehicle.”

2. On October 9, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties within the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station G and the investigative waiting room located in the Namcheon-gu Seoul, Seoul, Seoul, the Southern-gu Seoul, Seoul, Seoul, Seoul, for a driver’s assault, such as the preceding paragraph 1, and arrested as a flagrant offender and the victim’s security guards H during the atmosphere of the Gu Geumcheon Police Station G and Seoul, for “Pak-gu, Seoul, for the heading, for the heading, for the heading, for the heading, for the heading.”

Doese as a tax

“Abrutous,” and water purifiers used water in the water purifiers, which interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers’ duties by spreading it to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (or video analysis related to interference with the performance of official duties);

1. Article 5-10(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime and Article 5-10(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the act of assaulting a driver), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the act of obstructing the performance of official duties), each of the fines (the act of assaulting the driver of this case is recognized as a whole by the defendant, and the victim does not want punishment against the defendant by agreement regarding the crime of assaulting the driver of this case. In relation to the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties of this case, one million

arrow