The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the grounds of appeal.

2. Considering that the nature of the instant crime is not good, strict punishment against the Defendant is necessary.

However, when considering the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case and the conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence, the punishment of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable, since it is recognized that the defendant's punishment against the defendant is too unreasonable, since the defendant's punishment is too unreasonable. The defendant's above assertion is justified.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the defendant's appeal is with merit, and the judgment below is ruled again as follows.

Criminal facts

The substance of the facts charged and the summary of the evidence admitted by the court are as follows: (a) except for the addition of “the Defendant’s oral statement at the trial of the first instance” to “the Defendant’s own trial statement at the trial of the first instance” after the second page 10 of the judgment of the court below, and thus, it is identical to each corresponding column of the judgment of the court below, thereby

Application of Statutes

1. Article 327 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Articles 327 and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;