logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.12 2016나24887
손해배상
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: (a) No. 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance (No. 167) shall be deemed to be "No. 67"; and (b) No. 8, No. 4); and (c) in a case where a State agency instituted a public action based on evidence, etc. collected through an illegal act during the investigation process and received a final judgment of conviction; (c) as the existence of grounds for retrial became final and conclusive, the State agency's illegal act, etc. was sought damages against the State, barring any special circumstance, the obligee shall exercise the right within 6 months from the date when the judgment of innocence was revoked, which corresponds to the suspension of prescription under the Civil Act, within 6 months from the date when the judgment of innocence became final and conclusive; and (d) in a case where the obligee did not file a claim for damages within 6 months from the date when the judgment of innocence became final and conclusive, the Plaintiffs shall not be deemed to exercise the right to criminal compensation within 2014 months from the date of final and conclusive judgment.

In addition to adding "the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance" are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance.

arrow