The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (the first and second crimes in the original decision: imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months and the third crimes in the original decision: imprisonment with prison labor for 2 months) against the defendant in the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant include: (a) the Defendant’s recognition of the instant crime and reflects the mistake; (b) there is no criminal record exceeding the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with labor; and (c) the fact that the first and second crimes in the holding ought to be considered at the same time as the judgment becomes final and conclusive,

However, in the meantime, the Defendant committed the crimes of Articles 1 and 2 in the judgment of the same fraud, and committed the crimes of Articles 3 and 3 in the judgment during the suspension period of the execution period of the above fraud, and the crime of this case committed repeatedly against the person who trusted the Defendant, and the nature of the crime is not good, and the damage was not recovered, etc., which are disadvantageous to the Defendant. In full view of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments of this case, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, and whether there was any change in the situation after the sentence of the lower court, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is excessively unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.