logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.04.27 2019고단7702
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] The Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won by the Suwon District Court on October 15, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

On November 14, 2019, the Defendant driven D d d d cab from the front side of Suwon-si Station B to the front road of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, in a state of drinking alcohol concentration of 0.162%, even though the Defendant had a alcohol record as above, at approximately 6km from the blood alcohol concentration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Notification of the results of the drinking driving control and the drinking-measurement;

1. A written appraisal of blood alcohol;

1. Previous records: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records and investigation reports (Attachment of the same kind of judgment);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, despite the fact that the defendant had been subject to punishment once due to drunk driving, and the fact that the blood alcohol level is high, etc. are disadvantageous to the defendant, while the defendant recognizes the crime, while the defendant is in a serious reflection against the truth, traffic accidents are not committed, and the criminal records of the above drinking driving are criminal records, and there are no other criminal records, and there are no other criminal records, and the family and the branch support the defendant's wife, and the family and the branch want the defendant's wife's wife, shall be considered as favorable to the defendant. It is decided as per Disposition by taking into account all the other sentencing conditions shown in the records of this case.

arrow