logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.05.31 2016고정3
업무상횡령
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, from January 1, 2014, served as the president of the Korea Marin Association of Marine Association from January 1, 201 to the present date, is a person engaged in general affairs of the said Association C branch and funding

On March 29, 2014, the Defendant assaulted F, the same member as D and E, a member of the victim’s branch, and inflicted six weeks injury on F.

In the preceding district court for the above facts of crime, the defendant and D shall

5. 23. Each fine of KRW 3 million, and E, for the same year.

7. 23. A fine of KRW 3 million was sentenced respectively.

A. On July 8, 2014, the Defendant embezzled the amount of KRW 600,00,000 from among the bank passbooks (Account Number: H) in the name of the victim’s branch office in the name of the funds for operation of the victim’s branch office, which was established in the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan City G and the victim’s branch office office in the third floor, for the victim’s branch office, by transferring it to the previous local public prosecutor’s office under the name of the Defendant and D’s fine payment.

B. On July 11, 2014, the Defendant, while keeping a bank passbook in the name of the victim’s branch in business at the above location, transferred KRW 15 million among them to the Defendant and D and E under the pretext of the foregoing criminal case agreement, and embezzled it.

(c)

On November 2014, the Defendant, while keeping a bank passbook in the name of the victim’s branch at the above location on business, transferred KRW 3 million among them to the virtual account of the previous local public prosecutor’s office under the name of the E’s fine, and embezzled it.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the evidence alone presented by the prosecutor alone proves that the Defendant had an intent to obtain unlawful money to obtain the said money is beyond reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(a) the original Defendant and J, E are the “K.” within the jurisdiction of the victim’s branch.

arrow