logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.10.22 2020나20110
구상금
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. Of the appeal costs, the part arising between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is the Plaintiff’s participation in the appeal.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the E-vehicle owned by the Plaintiff’s Intervenor (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”). The Defendant is the manager of the Ftel in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu (hereinafter “instant officetel”).

B. On the instant instant officetel parking lot, a revolving board to turn off parking elevators and vehicles is installed, and there is a ground parking zone of two pages adjacent to the revolving board.

Among these, the right parking zone (hereinafter “instant parking zone”) is set up in front of a parking prevention zone, even if there is no hindrance to the opening and closing of the upper entrance, and in the event that a vehicle parks out of a parking line, only the vehicle which is short of the front place can park because there is a danger of collision with the vehicle moving out of the turning line, and the vehicle was installed on the front in order to inform this.

C. On May 21, 2019, the Plaintiff’s Intervenor: (a) driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle and visited the instant officetel to find the parking area; (b) was employed by the Defendant, and parked in the instant parking area under the instruction of G (hereinafter “parking”) who is in charge of parking management of the instant officetel.

However, since the plaintiff's vehicle was not a light car but a light car, the part of the vehicle was out of the parking line, and the parking manager was also aware of it.

On May 21, 2019, the occupant of the instant officetel moved a H vehicle from the wheel board (hereinafter referred to as “occupant vehicle”) around 18:32 on May 21, 2019. Moreover, the occupant of the instant officetel shocked the vehicle following the Plaintiff’s vehicle parked in the instant parking zone, which was parked, to the end of the vehicle moving in.

(hereinafter “instant accident”) e.

On June 13, 2019, the Plaintiff deducted 200,000 won from the Plaintiff’s automobile repair cost due to the instant accident.

arrow