The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. At the time of each of the instant crimes, the Defendant was in a state of weak ability to discern things or make decisions under the influence of alcohol.

B. The sentence of the judgment of the court below on unreasonable sentencing (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant's assertion of mental disability is acknowledged as having a drinking effect at the time of each of the crimes of this case, but in light of the circumstances leading to each of the crimes of this case, the method and method of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the defendant's assertion has reached a state where the defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

B. We examine the judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing. Although the defendant deposited KRW 500,00 to the victim H in the trial, it is recognized that the defendant had a same criminal record at several times, the defendant committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period, the victims want the punishment, and the defendant seems to have committed violent crimes after drinking. In light of the circumstances and attitudes of the crime of this case, the crime is not good, the court below sentenced the minimum punishment by discretionary mitigation, and all other matters concerning the sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the crime, risk of recidivism, etc., the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.