logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2021.01.28 2020고단4415
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The 2020 Go-so-called 4415 Go-so-called 2020 Go-so-so-called 4415 calls for the loan applicant to the financial company to the effect that “the repayment of existing loans will be made if the existing loans are repaid,” and then the financial company misrepresents its employees to obtain money by means of receiving damages from the loan applicants through cash collection measures.

On July 20, 2020, the Defendant: (a) received fee of KRW 100,000 per day or KRW 100,000 per day from the Plaintiff’s (hereinafter “B”); and (b) was employed by the Defendant; (c) under the direction through a telegram of the telegram of the name and non-management policy called “B”); and (d) received damages from the loan applicants in cash from the loan applicants while misrepresenting to the employees of financial companies; (c) printed out the certificate of full payment transmitted from “B” to the loan applicants; and (d) promised to deliver the loan applicants the certificate of full payment received from the loan applicants in cash; and (e) to deliver the loan applicants by dividing it into his designated account.

1. On July 24, 2020, the name influor of the Plaintiff’s name and influor of the Plaintiff’s request for a loan from the victim C by phone calls to the victim C, and falsely concluding that “The said victim applied for a loan in accordance with the direction of the victim’s name influor.” The name influor of the Plaintiff’s name influoring the Plaintiff’s name and influoration of the Plaintiff’s employee E-the-fact of the Plaintiff’s existing loan bank, and that “The Financial Supervisory Service may grant a loan of KRW 20 million from DTI regulation to its employee in cash.”

However, in fact, the above-mentioned persons were not members of the D Bank or E, and even if they received cash from the victims, they did not have the intent or ability to lend money to the victims.

On July 27, 2020, the Defendant is in the Republic of Korea F in the South-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Gyeong-do, around 13:00.

arrow