logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.12.17 2020노682
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses of the original judgment and the trial shall be borne by the defendant.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The written submission of the grounds of appeal shall be examined only to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed.

Until the new wall on the day of the instant case, the Defendant: (a) requested a substitute driver to drive by proxy on the way in which he drinks and drinks from the company's neighborhood to the new wall; and (b) was able to be divers in the early stage.

The proxy driving engineer was shouldered to be aware of tending paths, and the defendant was set up a vehicle at a place where the proxy driving engineer can stop because of a fake certificate and called the match.

The substitute driver returned the vehicle to facilitate the start of the defendant, and left the road. At the time, the starting operation was turned out, but the key was displayed as it is.

Although the defendant left a substitute driver, he was able to see him as he is, and she was trying to turn on the hickter by walking the hickter.

Since the Defendant’s vehicle was replaced and was in need of a stop, it was possible to sit on the steering string while driving the vehicle, but the Defendant was able to walk on the string of the string. However, in order to walk on the string of the string of the string to the string of the string of the string of the string on the electric wires, etc., and was sitting on the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string of the string.

During the process of moving back the Defendant’s body, the Defendant was changed from N to D (N) to D (D), and accordingly, the Defendant was able to drive the vehicle on a speed, and the Defendant did not drive the vehicle on a speed, since the Defendant did not drive the vehicle on a speed.

B. The lower court’s sentence is too heavy.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant is under the influence of alcohol level of 0.275% around April 6, 2019 when he/she violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving on at least two occasions in the instant facts charged.

arrow