A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, on February 5, 2016, committed fraud, on February 5, 2016, to a high school-friendly victim D at the “C coffee shop” located in Seocho-si B, Seocho-si, 2016, “a loan should not be made unless three months have elapsed since he/she moved his/her place of work, and three months have elapsed.

If the loan is lent under the name of the person, the principal and interest shall be paid every month and the repayment shall be made immediately as the loan is made.

However, in fact, the Defendant was receiving 1,50,000 won of the call center from A while working in A, but with respect to personal rehabilitation, which was decided to commence on August 27, 2014, the Defendant had no intention or ability to complete payment of the amount of KRW 690,00 per month, except for the interest and repayment on KRW 46,00,000 of the loans received on January 2015, and the amount of KRW 1,60,00 per month, and there is a need to pay the amount of KRW 1,69,00 per month, even if he borrowed money from others.

Around February 5, 2016, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, obtained the delivery of KRW 43 million to the National Bank Account (E) in the name of the Defendant from the victim.

2. On January 19, 2017, the Defendant was guilty of fraud on January 19, 2017, and the victim was unable to pay the interest on the loan to the victim at an infinite and below the end of January 2017.

It is possible to grant a loan to a loan broker for sunlighting.

On May 2017, 2017, Lymma made a false statement to the effect that Lymma would have a house director, and that he would receive a loan as security and repay all the borrowed money at once.

However, the Defendant’s monthly payments of KRW 6,90,000 for personal rehabilitation, KRW 1,000 for the principal and interest of KRW 46,000 for loans under the Defendant’s name, and KRW 43 million for the principal and interest of KRW 43,00,00 for loans borrowed under the victim’s name, were in need of disbursement of KRW 3,00,00 per month, and there was no plan to purchase the house under the Defendant’s mother’s name.