1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion B is a defendant’s employee.

The plaintiff has the principal amount of KRW 61,132,339 and damages for delay in this case through the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2008Gadan285006.

(2) On January 4, 2017, the Plaintiff issued a collection order under the Incheon District Court Order 2016TTT No. 20163, Jan. 4, 2017, with the benefit claim (excluding the claim prohibited from seizure) against the Defendant in this case based on the judgment bond.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the amount up to the judgment bond of this case among the benefits that the defendant is obligated to pay to B.

2. In order to accept the Plaintiff’s claim for collection of the principal claim against the Defendant partially even, it should be recognized that the Defendant’s benefits paid or payable to B exceed the prohibited portions.

However, according to the evidence No. 3 and No. 2, it is not sufficient to recognize that the benefits No. 2 exceed the part prohibited from seizure only by the evidence submitted by the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.