1. On July 27, 2013, the Defendant entered into an agreement on the division of inherited property with respect to shares of 2/13, out of 450 square meters in Asia-si, Busan-si.

In full view of the purport of the arguments as to Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and 12 and fact finding about 3,00,00 won as a whole, the above court applied for a payment order of KRW 5,80,00 to Eul-Id Capital Co., Ltd. (formerly changed) on May 18, 201 to the plaintiff on June 2, 201, and notified Eul of the above loan claim against the plaintiff on June 2, 201; Eul did not pay the above transfer money to the plaintiff; Eul did not pay the above transfer money to Eul; on July 12, 2013, 2013, the Seoul Eastern District Court issued an order for payment of KRW 13,429,657 and 5,690,330,000,000 won as to the inherited property of the plaintiff on July 12, 2013, which is the heir's 27,000,000.

The agreement on division of inherited property is to confirm the reversion of inherited property by either having all or part of the inherited property owned by each inheritor as a sole ownership or by performing as a new co-ownership relationship with respect to the inherited property which has been provisionally owned by co-inheritors upon commencement of inheritance, and therefore, it is a juristic act aimed at property rights by its nature, and thus, it can be subject to the exercise of the right to revoke fraudulent act.