logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.01.22 2015고단2088
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 12, 2015, the Defendant damaged D sales stores located in 14:00 in 14:0,00, by generating an aesthetic high-priced tool in the market price owned by the victim E.

2. On October 12, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.223% from blood transfusion around 14:05 on October 14, 2015, the Defendant driven H 110CC at a section of about 500 meters from the same place as the foregoing 1. paragraph to the front road located in net City F.

3. When the Defendant, at around 14:30 on October 12, 2015, driven a brea while under the influence of alcohol as described in paragraph (2) above, while driving a brea in the state of alcohol, as described in the foregoing paragraph (2) above, was subject to a request for a drinking test from the victim J. ( South, 41 years old) of the instant police station I police station that incurred a traffic accident and called to the site, the Defendant, who interfered with the performance of an injury and performance of official duties, received a demand for a drinking test from the victim J. ( South, 41 years old) of the instant police station I police station that

In other words, the above victim's face was taken up and the victim's left knifeed once, and the victim suffered about 14 days damage to scams, scambling, and injuries to scam, which require stability medical treatment, and continued to arrive at the scam of the net police station I police station, and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the control of drinking and criminal investigation of the above police officers once.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to K, J, and E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on detection of drivers;

1. Article 257(1), Article 366, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense; Article 148-2(2)1 and Article 4(1) of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant has a majority of the driving force of drinking and assaulted police officers who control drinking driving.

arrow