logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.12.20 2018고단4343
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 5 million won, and by a fine of 2 million won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on September 23:10, 2018, at the entrance and route of the bus stops located in the Western-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-ro, 496, the injured party E (58 tax) at the end of the subway station prior to the bus stops in the Seodaemun-gu, Daegu-gu, 2018, is not 'the age below the width' from the injured party while coming into existence as a matter of respect;

Defendant B, a hand on the ground that he was called “Fller L”, flicked the victim’s face, flicked the victim’s face by drinking, and her hand blicked the victim’s face. Defendant A continued to blick the victim’s face by her hand over the body part of the victim’s body to the bottom by pushing the victim’s face, and then, Defendant A blicked the victim’s face by drinking, and blicked the victim’s body part by going through the victim’s body part through the victim’s body part, with which the treatment period cannot be known.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for negligence

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the Provisional Payment Order: The Defendants had been subject to punishment several times due to the same kind of crime, etc.; Defendant A committed the instant crime during the period of the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor; Defendant B, who committed the instant crime during the period of the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor: The Defendants led to confession and reflect; the Defendants agreed to commit the instant crime; the Defendants appears to have committed the instant crime in contingency; the degree of injury to the victims is relatively minor; and the Defendants’ age, sexual behavior, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the instant crime; and the circumstances after the instant crime were committed.

arrow