(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.02.18 2016고단8 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.02.18 2016고단8

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 11, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Gwangju District Court Manpoon branch on December 14, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gwangju District Court.

Criminal facts

1. On February 10, 2015, the Defendant is the head of the DNA branch office to the victim C at a coffee shop where the trade name in Gwangju Northern-dong cannot be known.

In order to obtain a loan, it was said that the head of Gwangju branch office, the head of the Gu, and the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, and the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, would pay the loan properly.

However, the defendant was not the head of the Gwangju branch of the D company, and even if he received a loan due to the lack of property and income, he could not repay the loan.

Around February 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) caused the victim to provide a guarantee; (b) provided a loan to the victim with a total of KRW 25 million from the credit business chain, “E”, “F”, “G”, “H”, and “I” in total, KRW 5 million; (c) provided a guarantee to the victim; and (d) provided a guarantee to the victim by failing to repay the loan to the victim.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

2. On April 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at a coffee shop in which the trade name located in the Seoul Northern-dong is unknown; (b) “A gold bars equivalent to KRW 300 million to B; and (c) sold by melting this in KRW 300 million.

B. Along with a loan of KRW 3 million with a green-day fee, etc., the 300,000 won was paid to the Plaintiff at the end of April and the 100,000 won was to be lent as interest-free.

However, the Defendant was unable to lend KRW 100 million to the victim because he did not have a gold, and even if he did not borrow money from the victim due to the lack of property and certain income, he could not repay it.

The Defendant received KRW 3 million from the injured party on April 1, 2015.

유사 판례

-제주지방법원 2015.05.14 2014고단1814

-광주지방법원 2014.08.27 2014고단1649

-광주지방법원 2016.12.21 2016고단3844

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.05.01 2020고단26

-광주지방법원 2016.08.25 2015고단3508