The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person driving B X-ray automobiles.

On November 2, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 15:00, and driven the intersection of the shooting distance in front of the boundary line of the port railway located in the south-gu transmission at the port of port from the 1st page of the port railway to the 2nd two-lane of the port railway in the 2nd section of the port railway.

A person engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and led the victim C driver who is waiting for a signal signal at the front bank by negligence, and led the victim C driver to the back of the passenger vehicle in front of the Defendant vehicle.

In the end, the Defendant suffered damages to the victim C due to the above occupational negligence, such as the damage of the fresh and power lines, and other damages to the fresh that require approximately five weeks of treatment to the victim C.

2. Legal provisions applicable to the facts charged for judgment: The judgment dismissing the victim's non-prosecution of prosecution after the prosecution is instituted under Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act).