beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of this judgment shall be announced publicly.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is to find out a person who will work together with the victim D (58 tax) from the building of Kimhae-si around February 25, 2018 and from the second floor C of the building of Kimhae-si around 09:10 on February 25, 2018.
"라고 물었는데 피고인이 피해자에게 “ 사람이 어 딨 노 새끼야 ”라고 욕을 하여 피해자가 “ 왜 욕을 하느냐
“Along with the victim’s safety, the victim’s nose was exceeded at one time, and the victim was injured by approximately two weeks of treatment, i.e., coke, spons, spons, and spons (feld) of the victim.
2. The defendant alleged that he was in C with the children with intellectual disability at the time of the instant case, and there was no fact that the defendant dialogueed with the victim, or inflicted an injury on the victim.
3. In a criminal trial, the evidence of guilt should be strict evidence under the Criminal Procedure Act, and its probative value should have superior probative value that can cause a judge to have a reasonable doubt, and if there is no such evidence, even if there is a suspicion of guilt against the defendant, it should be determined in the interests of the defendant even if there is a suspicion of guilt against the defendant.
In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, the victim stated that the victim was the victim's noses by himself from the investigative agency to the court of this case while consistently dividing between the defendant and the defendant, the victim filed 112 reports immediately after the instant case, as stated in the above statement, and the police dispatched the defendant arrested the defendant as a flagrant offender, and the defendant was punished by injury to other customers even before the instant case. In light of the above circumstances, there is doubt that the defendant did not inflict injury on the victim, such as the facts charged in the instant case.
However, based on such evidence.