logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.01.09 2019나3618
부당이득금반환 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "No. 3 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance"; "No. 15" is added to "the purport of the same behavior"; "No. 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance provides that "the general obligation, its interest, compensation for delay, and other incidental obligations are prescribed as the scope of the secured obligation"; and "No. 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance (Articles 6 and 8)" is as follows: "No. 15 (3) of the Credit Guarantee Clause provides that "No. 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance can be applied to a claim other than the secured obligation which can be appropriated first with the collection money after the occurrence of the grounds for credit guarantee," and "no. 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance can be applied to a claim other than the secured obligation which the debtor bears against the issuer, endorser, and the obligee, and the obligee."

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow