beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 12, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 10 months for a violation of road traffic law (recognition refusal) in the Daegu District Court's Port Branch on January 12, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 20, 2017.
[2] On July 22, 2017, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license for a motor vehicle on July 22, 2017, driven a Bsch Rexn motor vehicle from the 26th road of 659 m, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul, to the lower end of the railroad crossing in the U.S. located in the same Gu, on the 1km section to the front road of the railroad crossing.
On August 5, 2017, the Defendant driven a Bsch-ton car from the 1.5km section to the parking lot adjacent to the south-gu moving port from the Pohang-gu to the south-gu moving port without obtaining a driver's license on August 5, 2017.
Summary of Evidence
"2017 Highest 994"
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Reporting on detection of any violation of the Traffic Act (non-licenseed driving);
1. "Motor vehicle driver's license ledger 2017 high group 1210";
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. C’s statement;
1. A traffic accident report;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ledger of driver's licenses;
1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, for the crime;
1. The reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes are as follows: (a) the Defendant repeatedly repeated without a license during the period of probation; (b) the background leading up to driving of the vehicle; and (c) the Defendant’s age, environment, sex behavior, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the records of the instant case, the sentence of sentence against the Defendant is deemed inevitable, and the sentence of sentence is determined as ordered.