Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On October 29, 2015, the Plaintiff acquired, in sequence, the remaining bonds from the Industrial Bank of Korea's five loans to the KBI Savings Bank, and notified the KBI Savings Bank of its business transfer.
B. The defendant set the loans to the Industrial Bank of Korea of the Bank of Korea of the Bank of Korea in the amount of KRW 12 million on March 26, 2004, KRW 18 million on December 5, 2005, KRW 54 million on April 11, 2006, and KRW 2 million on November 27, 2006, respectively.
(No data is to confirm which case of five loans). [Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of evidence A1 through 4 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. As to the claim for the guarantee claim that the plaintiff acquired, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff's claim was extinguished by the five-year commercial prescription period with commercial claim.
According to the statement No. 3-1, the Industrial Bank of Korea may recognize the fact that the Plaintiff acquired on June 18, 2008 and transferred the instant claim to a limited liability company specializing in securitization. In light of the above facts, at least on June 2008, the extinctive prescription period for the Defendant’s claim was commenced, and the instant lawsuit was filed on May 4, 2016, when five years have elapsed since it is apparent in the record that the Defendant’s objection to the extinctive prescription period was raised on May 4, 2016.
Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion does not need to be examined any more.
3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed for lack of grounds.