logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.02.04 2019나53856
사해행위취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

A. The grounds for appeal by the Defendant do not differ significantly from the allegations in the first instance court, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court was submitted to this court, and the testimony by the witness C of this court was taken, the gift agreement concluded on August 9, 2016 between the Defendant and C constitutes a fraudulent act that reduces the joint security of general creditors, and it is difficult for the Defendant to recognize that it is bona fide with regard to such circumstances, the fact-finding and judgment by the first instance court, which received the Plaintiff’s request for revocation of fraudulent act, is justifiable.

B. Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that “the employee of the plaintiff was engaged in the automobile transaction business along with the plaintiff,” and “the amount of KRW 1.2 million” of the second half of the judgment of the court of first instance as “the amount of KRW 1.1.2 million” of the second half of the judgment as “the amount of KRW 12.1 million” and “the amount of KRW 1.2 million” of the second half of the judgment as “the claim of KRW 12, 14, 5, and 6,” and “the order of Paragraph 11,” respectively, and “the donation of this case” of the third half of the judgment as “the donation contract of this case,” respectively, and “G” of the fourth half of the judgment as “C”, and “labor relations” of the fourth half of the judgment as “labor relations or trade relations” of the court of first instance as “the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, thereby citing it as is, pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow